I was watching a video today on Instagram that hit on a massive nerve for me. It was a critique of the current social media "channeling" culture—the one where everyone with a ring light and a dream thinks they are a direct pipe to the Divine, or the Pleiadians, or your dead Grandma Rose—and are making some pretty wild claims about “humanity” and “ascension”.
The problem as I see it isn't that people are opening up and learning that mediumship is a natural human ability; the problem is that they are doing it somewhat irresponsibly. We are seeing an explosion of untrained, un-vetted "transmissions" being blasted out to thousands of followers—which is really a form of spiritual psychosis. It’s what I call "Psychic Autocomplete”, a state where one’s mind, impatient and unrefined, simply fills in the blanks with spiritual clichés and takes them as truth; usually because it’s aspirational and “uplifting”.
If you want to move beyond the predictable and step into true mastery, you have to understand that discernment is not a secondary skill. It is the primary ethical tool of the psychic.
1. The Fallacy of the "Instant Download"
There is a dangerous myth in the modern spiritual world: that all you have to do is tune in, "get information," and then you should immediately share it.
It’s not that sharing what you sense, see, and know is inherently bad, or wrong. Or that the desire to help others is dangerous or inappropriate. Or that I’m trying to police who gets to do that, because really I’m not.
But as Rudolf Steiner warned in How to Know Higher Worlds, receiving spiritual communication is only half the job of the psychic. The second half—the harder half—is the vetting and discernment of that communication. Steiner insisted that for every one step you take in spiritual perception, you must take three steps in moral development and clarity. Without those three steps, your "transmissions" are incomplete, unfiltered, and potentially harmful. Your job as the channel is not just to receive and broadcast; for you as a being have a karmic relationship to what you share.
2. Gurdjieff and the "Unruly Servants"
George Gurdjieff famously taught that the human being is a collection of many different "I’s"—fragments of personality that each want to pretend they are the master of the house.
When you see a social media channeler personifying "Source" or speaking in vague, repetitive spiritual word salad, you are often just seeing one of those "I's" performing. They’ve heard enough buzzwords to "autocomplete" a message that feels spiritual, but they lack a Steward—a part of their own evolved consciousness that can watch these little "I's" of the body consciousness, or ego, and say, "Wait. Is this a message from the heights, or is this just my 'spiritual teacher' persona wanting to be seen?" Without that Steward, you aren't a channel; you’re just an echo chamber for your own unexamined ego personality.
3. Rodney Collin: The Physics of "Psychic Slop"
Rodney Collin explained exactly why these untrained transmissions feel so "off." In The Theory of Celestial Influence, he noted that true spiritual information moves at a "celestial" speed—near-instantaneous. Our analytical mind is relatively slow and heavy.
When an un-initiated channeler receives a high-speed frequency, their slow mind "clenches." To relieve the pressure of that speed, the mind reaches for the easiest, most generic templates it has: clichés about "Source," "the Shift," and "Light." This is "Spirit-World Autocomplete." It’s an incomplete transmission, because it’s not vetted and qualifies. It’s what happens when the channel isn't strong enough to hold the voltage.
4. The Ethics of the "Vetted" Message
True psychic work is a discipline, not a shortcut. It requires the humility to receive a message and not share it until it has been vetted for meaning.
Is it clear? (Or is it "slop"?)
Is it grounded? (Or is it just a spiritual trope?)
Is it responsible? (Or am I just feeding the collective "autocomplete"?)
Does it make someone or something “more special” (including the channel themselves?)
When we share un-vetted transmissions, we are being irresponsibly loud and creating an environment where spiritual psychosis can thrive. We are adding to the noise rather than the signal. As Steiner would say, we have an obligation to cultivate "Exact Clairvoyance"—a state where the spiritual image is as clear and sharp as a physical object, free from the smudge of our own desires.
Why a "Study Group" is the Antidote
This is why I don't just teach "how to be psychic." I teach how to be a conscious conduit. The world doesn't need more people who can repeat the word "Source." It needs clear, grounded, and discerning people who have the grit to do the "Work." In our Study Groups, we use the shared, conscious embodiment tools to:
Silence the "Autocomplete" of the analytical/ego mind.
Calibrate the channel’s body - including the voice box to handle the true speed of Spirit.
Establish an ethical framework so that when you do speak, your words have the weight of truth and can relieve you of negative karma as the channel
You’ve done enough "downloading." It’s time to start training to share your gifts and craft with the world. It’s time to move past "slop" and become a channel whose presence is a clear healing for what actually matters; not platitudes and hokey “ascension” truths.


